Trending: Anna University 8th Sem Results April 2014 May/June 2014 Time Table/ Internal Marks Calculate CGPA Online SSLC Results 2014 12th Result 2014

Test Footer 1

Sunday, December 23, 2012

ANNA UNIVERSITY B.ARCH 8TH SEMESTER SYLLABUS REGULATION 2009 2011 2012-2013

Latest: TNEA 2014 Engineering Application Status, Counselling Date, Rank List
ANNA UNIVERSITY B.ARCH 8TH SEMESTER SYLLABUS REGULATION 2009 2011 2012-2013 BELOW IS THE ANNA UNIVERSITY 8TH SEMESTER B.ARCH DEPARTMENT SYLLABUS, TEXTBOOKS, REFERENCE BOOKS,EXAM PORTIONS,QUESTION BANK,PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTION PAPERS,MODEL QUESTION PAPERS, CLASS NOTES, IMPORTANT 2 MARKS, 8 MARKS, 16 MARKS TOPICS. IT IS APPLICABLE FOR ALL STUDENTS ADMITTED IN THE YEAR 2011 2012-2013 (ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI,TRICHY,MADURAI, TIRUNELVELI,COIMBATORE), 2009 REGULATION OF ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI AND STUDENTS ADMITTED IN ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI DURING 2009

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS REGULATIONS - 2009 B. ARCH.
8th SEMESTERS CURRICULUM AND SYLLABUS

CODE NO COURSE TITLE L T P/S C
AR2451 Internship Program II x x x 10 
AR2452 Dissertation x x x 4
SUB TOTAL 14

AR2451 INTERNSHIP PROGRAM II L T P/S C
x x x 10
AIM: To expose students to the daily realities of an architectural practice through a one year
intensive internship program
OBJECTIVE:
 To facilitate an understanding of the evolution of an architectural project from design to
execution.
 To enable an orientation that would include the process of development of conceptual ideas,
presentation skills, involvement in office discussions, client meetings, development of the
concepts into working drawings, tendering procedure, site supervision during execution and
coordination with the agencies involved in the construction process. The internship program would be done in offices empanelled by the Institution and in firms
registered under the Council of Architecture.
The progress of practical training shall be assessed internally through submission of log
books supported by visual documents maintained by students every month along with the
progress report from the employer/s of trainees.
The students would be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1. Adherence to time schedule, Discipline.
2. Ability to carry out the instructions on preparation of schematic drawings, presentation
drawings, working drawings.
3. Ability to work as part of a team in an office.
4. Ability to participate in client meetings and discussions.
5. Involvement in supervision at project site.
At the end of the Internship program a portfolio of work done during the period of internship
along with certification from the offices are to be submitted for evaluation by a viva voce
examination. This will evaluate the understanding of the students about the drawings, detailing,
materials, construction method and service integration and the knowledge gained during client
meetings, consultant meetings and site visits.
46
TOTAL: 36 WEEKS
AR2452 DISSERTATION L T P/S C
x x x 4
Design studio emphasize on explaining and understanding Architecture primarily through the
mode of making. Dissertation offers an opportunity to look at architecture, history and design
primarily through textual. However, like design, dissertation involves process of observation,
reflection and abstraction. Students are encouraged to choose any topic of there interest. They
may range from analyzing the works of an architect, history, typological changes, writing, design
process and many more. The dissertation should state its objectives, followed by exhaustive
documentation and arguments. The emphasis however, could vary according to the topic. The
dissertation proposal in about 1500 words stating the topic issues to be explored and the scope
must be submitted. After approval the work would be periodically reviewed. A well written
report of a minimum 15,000 words must be submitted in the prescribed format, if any provided
by the University. The student would subsequently make a presentation of his/her work and
defend them.
TOTAL: 60 PERIODS
REFERENCES
1. Ian Border, Kurt Rueideu, The Dissertation, An Architectural Students Hand Book,
Architectural Press, 2000
2. Linda Grant and David Wang, Architectural Research Methods, John Wiley Sons, 2002


No comments:

Post a Comment

Any doubt ??? Just throw it Here...